Who saw this article? New!
Author: WILLIAM H. CLOSE - Close Consultancy (Courtesy of Alltech Inc.)
Trace minerals are a commonly ignored source of
nutrients in animal feedstuffs. Their physiological
roles are often underestimated and their presence
in the feed in adequate quantities taken for granted.
However, they are necessary to maintain body
function, to optimise growth, reproduction and
immune response. They therefore play an important
part in determining the health status of the animal.
A deficiency of these trace elements can cause a
considerable reduction in performance.
Mineral requirements
It is rather difficult to justify the term ‘requirements’
for minerals in the same way as it is for energy,
protein or amino acids. Requirements for minerals
are hard to establish and most estimates are based
on the minimum level required to overcome a
deficiency symptom and not necessarily to promote
productivity or indeed, to enhance immunity. Most
of the work relating to mineral requirements was
carried out in the 1960s and 1970s and may not
therefore apply to the modern animal. This is evident
from the recent review of NRC (1998) which, with
few exceptions, shows only minor differences in
mineral requirements proposed by NRC (1988) or
ARC (1981) (Table 1). No requirement is provided
for chromium. The differences in nutrient
requirements are the result of different production
targets and the differing physiological status of the
animal. There is therefore a paucity of information
on mineral requirements for current pig genotypes;
and Van Lunen and Cole (1998) have suggested
that the mineral needs for growth in the modern
fast-growing pig hybrids are about twice the level
required by the slower growing pigs of some 20-30
years ago.
Similarly, in a trial involving sows fed to national
recommendations (NRC, 1988), Mahan and Newton
(1995) have shown that the body mineral content
of animals at the end of the third parity was
considerably lower when mean litter weaning weight
at 21 days was above 60 kg, compared to below 55
kg, and for both groups it was significantly less than
at first mating at 9 months of age. This suggests that considerable de-mineralisation of the sow’s
skeletal structures occurred to meet the needs at
the higher level of production. Thus, the higher the
level of production, the greater the mineral needs
of the animal.
Table 1. Dietary requirements for trace elements (mg/kg diet)*.
*Values represent the highest value quoted.
1ARC (1981) per kg dry matter
2NRC (1998) 90% dry matter
3AFRC (1990) 90% dry matter
These results raise questions about the actual
mineral content in the diet, the availability of the
minerals to the animal and the effects of mineral
status of the animal on productivity. This is especially
pertinent to the breeding sow, and Richards (1999)
has shown that already in late gestation, the sow
must rely on her liver iron (Fe) reserves to meet
foetal demand for the mineral. This loss of minerals
from the body is further exacerbated during lactation.
If dietary intake during late pregnancy and lactation
is insufficient to meet metabolic demands and the
sow has to rely on her body stores, this continuous
drain on body reserves results in a reduced mineral
status, as shown by Damgaard Poulsen (1993). This
reduced mineral status is likely to result in poorer
performance.
Mineral allowances
Because of these concerns, minerals are often
provided in the diet at levels well above the
‘recommended requirements’. These are called
‘allowances’, and should take account of the class
of the animal, its level of performance, as well as
the source and bioavailability of the mineral. A survey
of the allowances commonly provided in diets in
several European countries has recently been
carried out by Whittemore and associates (2002,
personal communication) (Table 2). This shows the
wide variation in inclusion levels, with some as high
as 3-4 times those recommended in Table 1. These
are provided to ensure good rates of performance
and to meet the animal’s needs under the different
systems of production and management, as well as
to enhance immune and health status.
When determining mineral supplementation,
consideration must be given to the quantity and type
of raw ingredients, the processing of the diet, the
storage and environmental conditions, as well as
the inclusion and content of other minerals. Minerals
do interact and this must be taken into account. A
prime and well known example is the interaction
among copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe); and if
high levels of Cu are used for growth-promoting
purposes, then the requirements for both Zn and Fe
increase. Stranks et al. (1988) proposed that in diets
containing 175 mg Cu/kg, the level of Fe should be
increased to 200 mg/kg diet, whereas that for Zn
should be increased to 150 mg/kg diet. These values
are higher than those recommended in many national
standards and explain the high allowances in
commercial practice. Thus, the provision of minerals
is not straightforward.
Sources and bioavailability of minerals
Customarily, inorganic salts such as sulphates,
carbonates, chlorides and oxides are added to the
diet to provide the correct levels to meet animal
needs. These salts are hydrolysed in the digestive
tract to form free ions and are absorbed. However,
free ions are very reactive and can form complexes
with other dietary molecules, which are difficult to
absorb. The availability of the trace mineral to the
animal therefore varies considerably, and under
extreme conditions it may be unavailable for
absorption and therefore of little benefit to the
animal. Large quantities of undigested minerals are
then excreted and cause environmental pollution.
Table 2. Range of dietary mineral additions in several EU countries (mg/kg feed).

Whittemore, personal communication (2002).
Bioavailability is normally defined as the degree
to which an ingested nutrient in a particular source
is absorbed in a form that can be utilised or
metabolised by the animal. This therefore reflects
the absorption and utilisation of the nutrient ingested.
Even under similar conditions, there can be quite
large differences in availability. For example, in
chicks, Sandoval et al. (1997) measured the
bioavailability of Zn from carbonate, oxide or metal
as 78, 77 and 46%, respectively, relative to that of
Zn sulphate. Edwards and Baker (1999) compared
the bioavailability of three sources of Zn oxide, all
containing between 69 and 80% Zn, against that of
Zn sulphate. Relative to that of Zn sulphate, the
bioavailability of the oxide sources varied between
22 and 91%, when assessed using tibia Zn content.
They concluded that such differences have
implications for animal nutrition, not only because
of the higher costs per unit of available Zn, but also
because unabsorbed Zn could contribute to the buildup
of Zn in the soil, causing environmental pollution.
In more recent studies with piglets, Damgaard
Poulsen and Carlson (2001) evaluated the
bioavailability of several Zn sources by regressing
the rate of Zn retention and net absorption against
the rate of Zn intake, provided from Zn oxide, Zn
sulphate and Zn acetate. Surprisingly, the difference
in bioavailability among the different sources was
small: 22% for Zn oxide, 23% for Zn sulphate and
19% for Zn acetate. It was anticipated that the
bioavailability of Zn from the sulphate and acetate
sources would have been considerably higher than
that from the oxide source. In fact, daily Zn retention
reached a plateau of ~40 mg/day at a dietary intake
of 180 mg Zn/day.
Relative to Zn sulphate, the bioavailability of Zn
from the oxide and acetate sources was 95 and
85%, respectively. These compare with values of
67-87% determined by Wedekind et al. (1994)
based on metacarpal, coccyginal and plasma Zn
content. Thus, the estimate of bioavailability may
depend on the response trait measured.
Nevertheless, the bioavailability values in the studies
of Damgaard Poulsen and Carlson (2001) show that
there were no major differences in the bioavailability
of Zn from the different inorganic sources, implying
that 75-80% of the ingested Zn is excreted by the
animals.
For this reason, there is growing interest in organic,
that is proteinated or chelated trace minerals. In
this form, the trace element is chemically bound to
a chelating agent or ligand, usually a mixture of
amino acids or small peptides. This makes them
more bioavailable and bioactive and provides the
animal with a metabolic advantage that often results
in improved performance. They can therefore be
included at much lower levels without compromising
performance, thus minimising nutrient excretion and
environmental impact.
Environmental implications
Copper and Zn are of particular concern as regards
environmental impact, since inorganic sources (Cu
sulphate and Zn oxide) are often fed at
pharmacological levels that are well above the
physiological requirements of the animals in order
to promote growth rate and to prevent bacterial
diarrhoea. Their excretion contributes to soil and
water pollution and may well be toxic to plants and
animals. They are also the most likely to be toxic to
the microflora in the soil. It is for this reason that
the Animal Feed Committee of the European Union
has proposed maximum inclusion levels that are well
below current authorised levels (Table 3). These
values refer to the total content in the feed, including
that present in the raw ingredients.
Table 3. Current and proposed maximum levels of dietary Cu
and Zn in the EU.

Copper
Copper is required for the proper functioning of the
central nervous-, the immune- and cardiovascular
systems, as well as for pigmentation of the skin.
Although the minimum requirement is only 5-10
ppm, higher levels stimulate growth. Copper, and
Cu sulphate in particular, has therefore been added
to pig diets as a growth enhancer. However, recent
studies suggest that organic sources of Cu may be
more effective in promoting growth than Cu
sulphate, as well as minimising nutrient excretion.
Cereal grains normally contain between 4-6 ppm
Cu, whereas oilseeds have a higher content (15-30
ppm). Fish meals normally contain less than 10 ppm.
Smits and Henman (2000) evaluated the
performance of grower and finisher pigs fed diets
supplemented with either Cu sulphate (150 ppm Cu)
or organic Cu (40 ppm Cu as BioplexTM Cu). Those
pigs fed the diets with the organic Cu at 40 ppm
achieved similar levels of performance (P>0.05) to
those fed 150 ppm Cu from Cu sulphate. However,
there was a significant reduction in the quantity of
Cu excreted in the faeces. In faeces from pigs fed
40 ppm BioplexTM Cu, Cu concentration was 3 to 4
times lower than when fed Cu sulphate (Table 4).
Table 4. The growth performance and faecal Cu excretion of
pigs fed different Cu sources.

Smits and Henman (2000)
In a subsequent study, they further confirmed the
significant reduction in faecal Cu when BioplexTM
Cu (50 ppm Cu) was compared with Cu sulphate
(160 ppm Cu). They concluded that by replacing
high levels of Cu sulphate with lower levels of
organic (BioplexTM) Cu it is possible to maintain the
growth-enhancing effect of the diet, but since the
excretion of Cu was dramatically reduced, it will
be achieved in an eco-friendly and responsible way.
Studies by Carlson (2001) and Wu et al. (2001)
also reported that piglets in the post-weaning period
were able to maintain growth performance when
50-100 ppm Cu was provided from BioplexTM Cu,
compared with the customary level of 250 ppm Cu
from Cu sulphate. Additionally, they measured the
rates of absorption and retention not only of Cu, but
also of Zn and Fe. It is well known that Cu can
interact negatively with Zn and Fe, and vice versa.
As expected, increasing the dietary content of Cu
increased both the rate of absorption and retention
of Cu, but again, faecal excretion of Cu was lower
with BioplexTM Cu than with Cu sulphate. Piglets
fed the 50 or 100 ppm BioplexTM Cu also had a
higher rate of Zn absorption and retention, with lower
faecal Zn excretion (P<0.05), probably due to the
higher availability of the organic Cu. The rate of
absorption and retention of Fe was also higher on
the diets containing BioplexTM Cu compared with
Cu sulphate. This indicated that the use of organic
sources of Cu did not interfere with Zn or Fe
metabolism, unlike the inorganic Cu sources
(Table 5).
Table 5. Absorption and retention of Cu, Zn and Fe in pigs fed
different Cu sources.

Carlson (2001)
Zinc
Zinc is a component of many metabolic functions
and plays a vital role in hormone secretion, especially
those relating to growth, reproduction,
immunocompetence and stress. It is involved in the
process of keratin generation and in collagen and
skin nucleic acid synthesis.
The natural content of Zn in cereals is about 20-
40 ppm. Oilseed co-products, fish meal and meat
and bone meal all have higher content and may
contain up to 100 ppm. However, Zn interacts with
other minerals and Zn deficiency has been observed
in high calcium diets. Phytic acid will reduce the
availability, but this can be partly redressed by the
use of phytase enzymes. A supplement of Zn is
therefore required under most practical conditions.
In terms of immunocompetence, Zn has a positive
effect on both the immune response to pathogens
and the prevention of disease by maintaining healthy
epithelial tissue. In this respect, Zn oxide (ZnO) is
usually added at high inclusion levels (2-3 kg/ton)
to piglet diets because of its known pharmacological effects, increasing growth rate and reducing the
incidence of bacterial diarrhoea. Carlson et al.
(1998) also reported that high levels of ZnO altered
duodenal morphology (deeper crypts and greater
total thickness) and increased intestinal
metallothionein concentration, which indicated that
high amounts of Zn may also have an enteric effect
on the pig. However, the availability of ZnO,
compared with Zn sulphate and organic Zn, is low
and there is increasing concern about the high
content of Zn in slurry and the ensuing environmental
impact. Consequently, producers are more and more
looking at alternative sources of Zn.
A recent study by Carlson (2000) involved organic
Zn (BioplexTM Zn) and ZnO in the 4-week period
post weaning. Piglets were weaned at 21 days of
age and allocated to different dietary treatments.
There were seven treatments: control (no added
Zn), ZnO (2000 ppm) and 50, 100, 200, 400 and
800 ppm organic Zn (BioplexTM Zn). Over the entire
28-day nursery study, dietary Zn treatment had no
effect on growth performance, feed intake or feed
efficiency (Table 6). During the first two weeks of
the study, the piglets fed either 50 or 100 ppm Zn as
BioplexTM Zn had the greatest average daily gain
(P<0.01), compared to those on the other dietary
Zn treatments. It was concluded that feeding 50 to
100 ppm Zn as BioplexTM Zn may replace 2000 ppm
Zn as Zn oxide.
Mullan (2002, this volume) has recently shown
that piglets fed 100 ppm Zn from BioplexTM Zn had
the same growth rate as those fed 1500-2250 ppm
Zn from Zn oxide, but those piglets fed 250 ppm Zn
from BioplexTM Zn had superior growth rate
(P<0.01). Piglets fed the diets containing both levels
of BioplexTM Zn had significantly reduced levels of
Zn in faeces compared with those fed ZnO; indeed
it was no higher than that in the faeces of the control
piglets fed no supplemental Zn. Wu et al. (2001),
on the other hand, reported that piglets fed 2000
ppm Zn from ZnO had higher growth rates than
those fed BioplexTM Zn. Those fed ZnO numerically
retained the most Zn, but the proportion of Zn
absorbed and retained in relation to Zn intake was
less than that for the piglets fed either 200 or 400
ppm BioplexTM Zn. The piglets fed the ZnO also
excreted more than four times as much Zn as those
receiving organic (BioplexTM) Zn (Table 7). The
absorption and retention of Cu and Fe was highest
for piglets fed 2000 ppm ZnO.
Table 6. Effect of supplemental Zn on piglet performance.

Carlson (2000)
Table 7. Absorption and retention of Zn, Cu and Fe in pigs fed
different Zn sources.

Wu et al. (2001)
Conclusions
Trace mineral nutrition has been a particularly
neglected area of pig science and modern
genotypes, with higher levels of productivity, may
require higher levels than are currently
recommended. However, it is not just a question of
quantity, but very much a question of the source
and bioavailability of the mineral. The benefits of
including trace minerals at the level required by the
modern animal, and in the most readily absorbed
form, are measurable in increased performance,
better health and welfare and in reduced
environmental impact.
In this respect, organic minerals will play an
increasing role in pig nutrition, not only for meeting
the true requirements of the animal for optimal
performance but also for causing minimal
environmental impact. Indeed at the low levels
recommended by many national organisations, it is
likely that the only way these criteria can be
achieved is through the use of organic minerals.
References
Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC).
1990. Nutrient Requirements of Sows and
Boars, Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series
B, 60. TCORN, Report No. 4:383.
Agricultural Research Council (ARC). 1981. The
Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth
Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.
Carlson, M.S. 2000. A closer look at inorganic and
organic copper and zinc supplementation in
nursery pig diets. In: Biotechnology in the Feed
Industry: Proceedings of Alltech’s 16th Annual
Symposium (T.P. Lyons and K.A. Jacques, eds),
Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK,
pp. 301-308.
Carlson, M.S. 2001. Dietary trace elements for the
growing pig. In: Concepts in Pig Science (T.P.
Lyons and D.J.A. Cole, eds), Nottingham
University Press, Nottingham, pp. 147-156.
Carlson, M.S., S.L. Hoover, G.M. Hill, J.E. Link
and R.J. Turk. 1998. Effect of pharmacological
zinc on intestinal metallothionein concentration and
morphology in nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76
(Suppl.1), p. 57 (Abstr).
Damgaard Poulsen, H. 1993. Minerals for sows.
Significance of main effects and interactions on
performance and biochemical traits. PhD Thesis:
University of København.
Damgaard Poulsen, H. and D. Carlson. 2001.
Bioavailability of zinc from different zinc sources.
Paper N5.8. Proc. European Assoc. of Anim.
Production Annual Meeting.
Edwards, H.M. and D.H. Baker. 1999.
Bioavailability of zinc in several sources of zinc
oxide, zinc sulphate and zinc metal. J. Anim. Sci.
77:2730.
Mahan, D.C. and E.A. Newton. 1995. Effect of
initial breeding weight on macro- and micromineral
composition over a three-parity period
using a high-producing sow genotype. J. Anim.
Sci. 73:151.
National Research Council. 1988. Nutrient
Requirements of Swine. 9th Revised Edition.
National Academy Press, Washington.
National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient
Requirements of Swine. 10th Revised Edition.
National Academy Press, Washington.
Richards, M.P. 1999. Zinc, copper and iron
metabolism during porcine fetal development.
Biological Trace Element Research 69:27.
Sandoval, M., P.R. Henry, C.B. Ammerman, R.D.
Miles and R.C. Littell. 1997. Relative bioavailability
of supplemental inorganic zinc sources for chicks.
J. Anim. Sci. 75:3195.
Smits, R.J. and D.J. Henman. 2000. Practical
experiences with Bioplexes in intensive pig
production. In: Biotechnology in the Feed
Industry, Proceedings of Alltech’s 16th Annual
Symposium (T.P. Lyons and K.A. Jacques, eds),
Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp.
293-300.
Stranks, M.H., B.C. Cooke, C.B. Fairbairn, N.G.
Fowler, P.S. Kirby, K.J. McCracken, C.A.
Morgan, F.G. Palmer and D.G. Peers. 1988.
Nutrient allowance for growing pigs. Research
and Development in Agriculture 5:71.
Van Lunen, T.A. and D.J.A. Cole. 1998. Growth
and body composition of highly selected boars and
gilts. Animal Science 67:107.
Wedekind, K.J., A.J. Lewis, M.A. Giesemann and
P.S. Miller. 1994. Bioavailability of zinc from
inorganic and organic sources for pigs fed cornsoybean
meal diets. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2681.
Wu, C., A. Tsunoda, D.W. Bollinger, M.S. Carlson,
T.L. Veum and G.W. Tibbetts. 2001. Reducing
pharmacological levels of copper and zinc in
nursery pig diets: response to zinc and copper
proteinates. In: Biotechnology in the Feed
Industry: Proceedings. of Alltech’s 17th Annual
Symposium (T.P. Lyons and K.A. Jacques, eds),
Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp.
285-295.
Author: WILLIAM H. CLOSE
Close Consultancy, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK
Author: WILLIAM H. CLOSE - Close Consultancy (Courtesy of Alltech Inc.)
Who saw this article? New!
MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THIS ISSUE.
|