Comunidad de Negocios Internacionales relacionados con la producción animal
Usted necesita actualizar su Flash Player
Site:
Aquaculture MYCOTOXINS Poultry Industry Pig Industry Dairy Cattle Feed
Technical Articles / Technical Articles' List / Back to Mycotoxins
 

Mycotoxins in animal feed: is there really a problem?

Readers' Rating: (See details)  Rate this article

Send enviar   (1 Sent)

Who saw this article? New!


Author: E.M. Binder, E. Pichler, M. Kainz, V. Starkl


Our thanks to the author and Conference Organisers, a Committee consisting of both University and Industry colleagues.

The full paper will appear in the Conference Proceedings ('Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition - 2007', edited by Phil Garnsworthy and Julian Wiseman) published by Nottingham University Press in the autumn of 2007
www.nup.com




Courtesy of the 41st Annual University of Nottingham Feed Conference www.nottingham.ac.uk/biosciences/ah/research/conferences.php



Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by filamentous fungi that can cause a toxic response (mycotoxicosis) when ingested by higher animals. Due to modern methods and thanks to a growing interest in this field of research more than 300 different mycotoxins have been differentiated so far.


However for a practical consideration in the feed manufacturing process only a small number of toxins is of relevance, with aflatoxins, trichothecenes, zearalenone, ochratoxins, and fumonisins being of particular interest, though it has to be mentioned that the extent of harm each toxin (group) can cause is highly species-dependant.


A three year survey program was initiated in order to evaluate the incidence of mycotoxins in feeds and raw materials in some of the major European animal production regions. Grain and feed samples were sourced directly at feed mills or animal production sites and sent to Quantas Analytik in Austria, where all analyses were performed by means of high performance liquid chromatography within the period of January 2004 to December 2006.


Mycotoxins tested for were those known for their impact on feed industry and animal husbandry: deoxynivalenol (DON), T-2 toxin, zearalenone (ZON), ochratoxin A (OTA), and aflatoxin B1 (AfB1). A total of 1838 samples sourced from European and Mediterranean markets was tested, with 3231 single analyses performed (1838 tests for DON, 943 ZON, 270 T-2 toxin, 109 OTA, and 71 AfB1, respectively).


In order to get a better overview about toxin occurrence in certain regions, data were grouped as follows: Northern Europe (Denmark, Belgium, Finland, UK, Norway, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Latvia), Central Europe (Romania, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, Hungary, Switzerland, Austria, Germany, Czech Republic), and Southern Europe and the Mediterranean region (Slovenia, Bulgaria, Portugal, France, Croatia, Spain, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus, Italy).


Highest incidence was observed with DON, which occurred in all commodities tested. Out of a total of 1838 samples 1162 were positive for DON, at an average contamination level of 380μg/kg. Levels (median and arithmetic mean) observed were slightly higher in Central and Southern Europe than in the North. Commodities mainly affected were corn, finished feed and wheat. 76% of all corn samples tested were positive for DON, with the overall contamination rate increasing from 59% in 2004, to 79% in 2005, and 90% in 2006. The median contamination level was 290μg/kg in 2004, 360μg/kg in 2005, and 604μg/kg in 2006, which indicates not only a very high incidence in 2006 but also high contamination levels.


A similar trend could be observed in finished feeds, with contamination rates of 56% (2004), 57% (2005), and 79% (2006), and respective median levels of 167, 214, 368 μg/kg. 74% of all wheat samples were positive for DON, though only in years 2004 and 2005 representative sample numbers were received; the median contamination levels were 284μg/kg and 370μg/kg, respectively.


With regard to ZON a total number of 943 analyses was performed, indicating an overall three year contamination rate of 34% (i.e. 320 samples positive). No particular difference in levels detected was observed with regard to sampling regions, except in 2006, when particularly Central European samples showed higher incidence (58%) and higher levels (mean: 220μg/kg, median: 100μg/kg), than other regions and earlier observation periods. Commodities mainly affected by ZON were corn (54% positive); wheat and wheat brain (47%), and finished feed (43%).


In 2004 165 samples were tested for T-2 toxin; the contamination rate was 40% with most of the positive samples originating from Northern Europe (64 positive of 152 tested).


In the year 2005, of 59 tested samples 32% were positive, again also primarily derived from the North (18 out of 32 samples). In 2006 only 46 samples were tested for T-2 toxin, all of them were negative. In contrary to earlier years only five of these samples were sourced in Northern Europe while the majority, i.e. 34 samples came from Central Europe, which also did not account for relevant T-2 contamination in prior years, so the result is not surprising at all.


Throughout the three year survey 109 samples were tested for Ochratoxin A, indicating an average contamination rate of 30%. In 2004 11 out of 42 samples tested positive, in 2005 15 out of 32, and in 2006 7 out of 35, respectively. No clear geographic allocation of contamination prevalence could be made, except in 2005, when the overall contamination rate was higher (47%), with samples from Central Europe and the South contributing primarily.


Out of 71 AfB1 analyses performed over the full project period, which included nine corn samples, 8 soy samples, one wheat and barley, each, as well as 18 finished feeds and 34 unspecified feed ingredients, only 5 samples were positive, the highest level identified at 14μg/kg in an unspecified feed ingredient.


Thus the aflatoxin sample population cannot be considered representative at all but is reported here in order to give a comprehensive picture of the full survey. Although scientific literature offers a broad variety of information on the effects of individual mycotoxins in various animal species, it is the multiple mycotoxin contamination that matters life-stock industry most, as it refers to the naturally occurring circumstances.


For example, aflatoxin and fumonisin B1, as well as DON or other trichothecenes (one or even more of them) and zearalenone frequently occur together in the same grain. Additionally, in the feed manufacturing process different batches of different raw materials are mixed together thus producing a totally new matrix with a new risk profile in the due course of manufacturing.


Poor livestock performance and/or disease symptoms observed in commercial operations may be due to the synergistic interactions between multiple mycotoxins. Strategies to prevent mycotoxicoses include pre- and post-harvest strategies; the latter are often categorized into physical, chemical and biological methods.


The best way would be the prevention of mycotoxins in the field in the first place, which is supported by proper crop rotation and fungicide administration at the right time. In case of toxin manifestation measures are required that act specifically against certain types and groups of toxins.


The most prevalent approach counteracting mycotoxins in the feed industry is to include sorbent materials, like clay minerals or yeasts, into the feed, for more or less selective removal of toxins by means of adsorption within the route of the gastrointestinal tract, or to add enzymes or microbes capable of detoxifying certain mycotoxins or toxin groups.




Authors: E.M. Bindera, E. Pichlerb, M. Kainzb, V. Starklc
a Biomin Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430 Tulln, Austria
b Quantas Analytik GmbH, Technopark 1, 3430 Tulln, Austria
c Biomin, 11 de Septiembre, No 2628, Piso 12, Dpto 4, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, ZIP 1428, Argentina



Author: E.M. Binder, E. Pichler, M. Kainz, V. Starkl

Readers' Rating: (See details)  Rate this article

   Send   enviar   (1 Sent)

Who saw this article? New!


DISCUSSIONS ON THIS ISSUE.

 Make a comment about this issue

 10/03/2007  
Hong Yang
Research/adm
Illinois - United States of America
Great paper. More mycotoxin research data should be reported.
Answer Checked by Engormix.com
ENGOREART MYC 20080517
 
Usted necesita actualizar su Flash Player
Usted necesita actualizar su Flash Player
Usted necesita actualizar su Flash Player
  Related Products
 
Special Nutrients Inc. (United States)
MYCO-AD A-Z
MYCO-AD A-Z is the new generation of mycotoxin binders that involves a special process, in which the clay is purified by extracting all the non-...
 
 
Agranco Corp. (United States)
Agrabond
Selective Adsorbant of Fusarium and Aspergillus Mycotoxins for Poultry Breeders and layers, Swine and Bovine TECHNICAL SUMMARY What is AGRABOND?...
 
 
Priya Chemicals (India)
Protein Hydrolysate Soln. SoyaBase (NON GMO)
Protein Hydrolysate Solution is manufactured from Soyabean (NON GMO) by enzymic hydrolysis and thus retains all essentail Amino Acids in L Form.The P...
 
 
C.Y.C. Agricultural Technologies & Management Ltd. (Israel)
-Toxi Bond™
An additive that should be mixed in with the Ruminants or other animals complete feed, its aim is to prevent and to slow the development of molds in f...
 
 
Süd-Chemie (Germany)
TOXISORB
TOXISORB® – Feed Additive for the Deactivation of all kind of Mycotoxins. TOXISORB® effectively binds all kinds of mycotoxins and thus render...
 
 
Trilogy Analytical Laboratory Inc. (United States of America)
CertifiedSR Mycotoxin Reference Materials
Trilogy Analytical offers certified reference materials for quality control of mycotoxin methodology. Trilogy processes these samples under strict qua...
 
 
Biomin (Austria)
Mycofix Plus
The Mycofix® Plus product line represents a modular system that protects animal health by deactivation of mycotoxins, taken in with respectively conta...
 
 
Arts Project Support (Netherlands)
Independent consultancy
Independent advice in a broad field in the food and feed sector, concerning food safety, residues and contaminants. Laboratory investigations and inde...
 
 
Avitech Animal Health Pvt. Ltd. (India)
Avsorb+
Avsorb+ is a unique toxin binder for adsorption of mycotoxins & other toxins. Avsorb+ is active against wide spectrum of toxins including mycotoxins,...
 
 
KeTox A/S (Denmark)
Mycotoxin binders
We have a series of mycotoxin binders based on minerals and yeast...
 
 
  Technical Articles
  How much MYCOFIX® do I have to add to be SAFE???
Last November, one of Argentina’s largest table egg producers conducted a trial using Mycofix® Select in the diet of laying hens a ...

Determination of fungal microbiota and mycotoxins in brewers grain used in dairy cattle feeding in the State of Bahia, Brazil
The aim of this study was to determine the mycoflora and evaluate the presence of aXatoxins and ochratoxins in brewers grain used ...

Mycotoxins in animal feed: is there really a problem?
Our thanks to the author and Conference Organisers, a Committee consisting of both University and Industry colleagues. The full ...

The effect of feed-borne Fusarium mycotoxins on reproductive efficiency in dairy cows, sows and broiler breeders
Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites that can reduce performance and alter metabolism of livestock and poultry (Wannemacher et al., 1 ...

Effects of feed-borne Fusarium mycotoxins on metabolism and reproduction in gestating and lactating sows: response to Mycosorb®
There are numerous reports indicating that weanling piglets (Friend et al., 1982, Döll et al., 2003) and growing and finishing pig ...

An Attept to Alleviate Aflatoxicosis on Nile Tilapia Fish by Dietary Supplementations with Chicken-Hatchery By-Products (Egg Shells) and Shrimp Processing Wastes (Shrimp Shells) - First Part
This experiment was conducted to study the drastic effects of graded levels of aflatoxin-Bon growth performance, survival rate, an ...

Monitoring for aflatoxins and ochratoxins in cereal based infant formula in Nigeria
Aflatoxins and ochratoxins are common contaminants of cereals and cereal – based products. A national survey for aflatoxins and oc ...

The negative effects of various mycotoxins on the immune system of poultry
The immune system is the defense mechanism of the body of which key organs are thymus, bursa, liver and spleen. In pou ...

Ochratoxin A in beverages
Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites frequently associated with grains, cereals, and other human and animal foods obtained from these ...

Clinical implications of mycotoxicosis in companion animals
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites of fungi, which are also commonly known as molds. Fungi that produce mycotoxins of veterinary ...

See all...

 
 Related Forums
 Article: Monitoring for aflatoxins and ochratoxins in cereal based infant formula in Nigeria

News: First Quantitative Test for Ochratoxin in Grain and Feedstuff

News: Scientists Pit Bacteria against Fungi to Protect Wheat

News: Test Flood-Damaged Corn for Mold Before Feeding to Livestock

Article: Molds in Fish Feeds and Aflatoxicosis

Article: Molds, Mycotoxins and Their Effect on Horses

Article: Mycotoxicosis in Horses: A Worldwide Concern!!!

Article: The negative effects of various mycotoxins on the immune system of poultry

News: UK - Record mycotoxin levels prompt grain rejection fears

Article: Interpretation of the results of mycotoxin's analysis in feed

News: Corn Growers Request an Increase in Aflatoxin Research Funding

News: USDA ARS - Friendly Fungus Helps Keep Aflatoxin Out of Cotton

News: World Mycotoxin Journal: a not-to-be-missed research journal

Article: Toxicological Synergism between Fusarium Mycotoxins in Feeds

Article: European experts see an increase in mycotoxin contamination globally - A mycotoxin risk management system can help

AREAS
Home | Aquaculture | Mycotoxins | Poultry Industry | Pig Industry | Dairy Cattle | Feed
MYCOTOXINS
Home | Events | Companies and Products | Home | Forums | Technical Articles | Professionals Guide | News

Copyright © 1999-2008 Engormix.com - All Rights Reserved.