Dear Friends:
I believe that it is necessary to differentiate the exploitations in Small, Medium and Big. When we speak of Small, they are generally managed by the own family, and here yes it is important to look for supplementary feeding that can help to lower the costs, because the own owner of the exploitation goes if he has or non result the use of a supplement calls you, sweet potato, yucca, etc, etc. these exploitations don't Usually measure the profitability per you, but rather it is a way of subsistence, that is to say that have few mothers and few animals in it feeds, and they even can until selling the animals below the bought price, and when abundance of these exploitations, the price exists it is possible to transform product of a black market, like in the case of the Ecuador, Nicaragua, etc.
When the exploitations are medium, and I refer to those that go from 50 mothers to 500, it is already then had an administrator, probably a doctor and he/she has consultantships, and it is very probable that is already as the exploitation but commercial that of subsistence, and in all that I have seen it is a little difficult to implement a program with the use of supplements that is not through a complete feeding based on a formula that can be in dry, or like it is ventilated in liquid Europe as soup.
And the exploitations Big y/o mega projects still find it more difficult this.
Such and as I commented it some time ago, I believe that depending on the area, the country or the type of exploitation that one has is important to make a program of what it is what is wanted to achieve. For ejempl,o for small exploitations, indeed I would try to look for alternative of feeding, use of you excrete them to produce gas, payment and of using modules in each stage, in such a way that if it will grow, alone he/she has to give continuity to the infreestructura.
If they are medium and big exploitations, here it is a Financial and Productive topic. Although it is certain the feeding it is a 65 at 70 of the production cost, if we don't have a good productivity in the number of pigs for mother to sacrifice, our costs won't lower. Today this super proven that it doesn't care the cost of the food in the small stages, because here the price of the kilo of food is high, and in the measure that the pig goes growing the feeding or the kilo of food is cheaper, for it exists it a relationship between the sale weight and the cost of produced kilo of meat, in that sense today per today the new races or genetic lines, allow to take to the pig to weight I live from 113 to 115 kg or of 250 pounds with a grosor of spectacular fat.
The porcinocultura in my opinion has 5 paws of the table: Genetics, Nutrition, Sanity, Facilities and Teams and lastly Handling. He/she can that we have the best genetics, the best installation and teams, the best handling and the best Sanity, but if we don't have a good Nutrition, the productive parameters will be faulty and I can mention this way other examples. I believe important that one cannot neglect none.
Recently he/she played me to make together with a Financier a diagnosis for a company of 300 stomaches that was losing, and I take us near 6 months to lift all the information... at the end we lift several scenarios in a computer program that allowed us to have as much the Financial part as the productive ammarrada, in such a way that if we changed an index, I eat for example to ascend of 8.9 born alive at 10.5 that was reflected automatically, in the state of results and the loss diminished, and we made this way it with: to lower mortality pre weans, to elevate the number of childbirths for cerda/año, to elevate the sacrifice weight, to lower the nutritious conversion and I take us to it to the recommendation that this company that was losing had to invest 250 Thousand Dollars to obtain: New Genetics 100, to Improve Facilities, Improvements the Nutrition and to Hire a Veterinarian... after one year this company was with 10.5 NV, 9.2 detetados, 2.42 partos/cerda year, the weight to sacrifice was of 110 Kg and the economic recovery was favorable, determining a kilo cost a lot but I lower, with diets of more cost.
The problem in the Porcinocultura is that many farms don't take registrations and it is sometimes difficult to make an I diagnose precise, and the first thing that it is necessary to make is to lift information of everything, at least of one year to be able to make forecasts.
In summary, I believe important to make or to look for alternative, but let us take care of the productivity of the cluster that has to do with the production and with the reproduction, with good nutrition alternatives according to the requirements of the existent genetics and for ende, to see the financial part as for as going down costs, but the sum from everything to the fianl, to follow the outline of having a good table with the 5 very stable paws is what will indicate us as lowering the cost of the pound or the kilo of meat of produced pig.
Greetings,
Oscar A. Osorio C.
Panama |
|