Hernando King!
I like of tí knowledge. Good, the recommendation that I gave you was rather to analyze the efluente. Really, I hope you have followed that first step. The main reason of that recommendation, is for the possible presence of materials that you/they could force to a previous treatment of the efluentes. Alone as an example. If the stable uses some cellulose material as bed (sawdust, straw of rice, etc), this product could make collapse the system. This without mentioning the sands, ashy, antibiotics, etc... that they could be in the waste.
Now then, already discarded that first point, the election of the systems UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket), and the EGSB (Expanded to Granulate Sludge Bed), they consist in that in the second, a distribution of the density of the granules is allowed (and of areas of more activity), in the column of the digestor (that by the way, it is much bigger to a digestor UASB). However, this technology depends a lot more than the systems of control of flow, because it is prone to the Chanelling when happening an increase of the pressure, and to be given the case that the flow passes without finding the resistance of the granules, and therefore, diminish its conversion efficiency. Eye that when thinking about the design of these digestores, they think about stationary systems, and therefore, he/she should stay a balance among the bacterial mass that is GENERATED and the size of the granules...
And it is not so easy to maintain it!
I hope it has served the previous explanation so that you make a guessed right decision.
Lastly, I reiterate you my support in your project. Even the Engineer Montanaro of the Forum Production of Biogas - you Plant Centralized and Simplified, it could lean on in the civil topic.
Greetings and successes! |
|