 
Who saw this article? New!
Author: Dr. Steve Leeson
Introduction
Since the start of the modern broiler industry, feed efficiency has been one of
the major criteria used in defining the performance of broiler chickens. In North
America, feed efficiency is described as feed intake:weight gain. In Europe, the
calculation is usually reversed, being described as weight gain:feed intake. What
ever system is used, the idea is to obtain a measure of how efficiently the feed
is being utilized, which is obviously of economical importance because feed represents
about 65% of total cost of production. Feed is used by the bird for two basic
reasons, namely for growth and for maintenance. In young birds most feed is used
for growth and little is used for maintenance, and so efficiency is very good.
Over time efficiency deteriorates because the broiler has an ever-increasing body
mass to maintain. Over the years we have seen a steady decline in feed efficiency
from around 2.2 in the early 1960's to 1.75 today under certain situations. This
continually improving situation is due to improved genetic potential, and the
fact that more feed is directed towards growth (and less for maintenance) as days
to market decline. However many in the poultry meat business are now questioning
the usefulness of classical feed efficiency. The main reason for such concern
relates to changes in the industry, where today we have a vast range of potential
bird weights and ages, together with males and females potentially being grown
separately, and so consequently there is a range of dietary specifications and
feeding programs. Today, there is a trend to consideration of energy efficiency
rather than feed efficiency, and for new measures of efficiency, such as feed
cost/kg live weight through to feed cost/kg deboned breast meat or even feed cost
per kg meat per square meter of floor space. Following is a review of factors
that can influence feed efficiency, together with discussion on some new ideas
for quantitating feed usage in relation to limitations of such classical values.
Diet energy level
It has been suggested that the broiler eats to its maximum physical capacity,
and varying the energy density of the diet can easily control the birds' energy
intake. This fact may be true to some extent with the young broiler because we
can temper early growth rate (ascites control programs, for example) by feeding
lower energy diets. However as the boiler gets older it does seem to adjust its
intake in relation to diet energy level so as to normalize its energy intake.
Table 1 shows the results of diluting the feed to very low levels in diets for
birds from 35-49d.
TABLE 1. Effect of diet dilution from 35-49d
of age on broiler performance
|
Diet ME(kcal/kg) |
Diet CP(%) |
49d bodywt. (g) |
Feed intake35-49d (g) |
Feed:gain35-49d |
Energy efficiency(Mcal/kg gain) |
|
3200 |
18 |
2950 |
2580 |
2.34 |
7.43 |
|
2900 |
16 |
2920 |
2760 |
2.49 |
7.19 |
|
2600 |
14 |
2880 |
2900 |
2.72 |
6.97 |
|
2300 |
13 |
2910 |
3370 |
2.99 |
6.70 |
|
1900 |
11 |
2910 |
3670 |
3.31 |
6.37 |
|
1600 |
9 |
2890 |
4300 |
4.01 |
6.41 |
Adapted from Leeson et al. (1996)
In this study, a series of diets were produced by diluting a conventional 3200
kcal/kg finisher, by adding oat hulls. As the diet was diluted, the birds simply
ate proportionally more feed, and body weight was little affected. It is surprising
that the broiler can grow adequately on a diet containing just 1600 kcal ME/kg
and 9% crude protein. As shown in Table 1, the bird was able to maintain growth
simply by eating vast quantities of feed. Classical feed efficiency obviously
declined, and with the most dilute diet the feed:gain was 4.01 from 35-49d. Most
producers could be very concerned with this number. However, if we look at energy
efficiency, the broilers fed this very dilute diet, in fact, converted energy
most efficiently. In fact, as classical feed efficiency declined, so energy efficiency
improved. Obviously it is totally impractical to feed such extremely diluted diets,
but the study does show that classical feed efficiency in this situaiton was very
misleading in defining energy efficiency (or energy costs).
High energy feeds obviously cost much more than do low energy feeds, and so there
is a price to pay for improved feed efficiency brought about by using, for example,
high-fat diets. Table 2 shows an example of using diets with a mean energy value
of from 3000 up to 3300 kcal/kg fed to male broilers to 45d. Diet energy has no
effect on growth rate, but will affect feed intake as discussed previously. Feed:gain
therefore improves as diet energy level increases. However, the higher energy
feeds are more costly, and when we calculate feed cost per bird, the least cost
in this particular case is seen at 31000 kcal ME/kg. As often happened, in this
situaiton, the best feed efficiency was not the most profitable. Obviously economic
evaluations must be calculated for local conditions.
TABLE 2. Effect of diet energy level on
broiler performance and feed costs.
|
Average diet energy (kcal/kg, starter through finisher) |
Feed cost $/tonne |
45d maleB.Wt. (kg) |
Feed:gain |
Feed cost/bird($) |
|
3000 |
220 |
2.7 |
2.10 |
1.25 |
|
3100 |
230 |
2.7 |
2.00 |
1.24 |
|
3200 |
250 |
2.7 |
1.90 |
1.28 |
|
3300 |
270 |
2.7 |
1.80 |
1.31 |
So called 'broiler growth models' today are able to identify the most profitable
diet, given feed prices, broiler prices, expected performance, etc. The diet
is ultimately least-costed in the traditional way, but this prior selection
is often referred to as "maximum profit formulation".
Separate-sex growout
The feed efficiency of female broilers will usually be higher (less efficient)
than for male birds of corresponding weight, after about 30 days of age. The
reason for this is that female birds tend to deposit proportionally more fat
in the carcass (Leeson et al., 1988). Body fat takes 9 times as much feed energy
to produce as does muscle. Muscle is only about 20% protein by weight, the remainder
being water. For this reason it is usually uneconomical to grow female broilers
much beyond 45d unless special emphasis is placed on reducing fat deposition.
Likewise with heavy male birds, feed efficiency is going to be greatly influenced
by the growth of fat vs. muscle.
Bird age
As birds get older, their feed efficiency will deteriorate. This situation is
simply due to the fact that heavy birds use increasing quantities of feed to
maintain their body mass. In the 7d old bird, about 80% of feed is directed
to growth and only 20% is needed to maintain the small body size - consequently
feed is used very efficiently. In an 8-week old bird these numbers are reversed
such that only 20% of feed is used for growth, and 80% is needed to maintain
the every-increasing body mass. Consequently, feed efficiency deteriorates over
time.
Barn temperature
The broilers' maintenance energy needs are greatly influenced by the
temperature of its environment. After initial brooding, the bird must use some
of its feed to maintain its body temperature (Sandercock et al., 1995). Under
ideal conditions of around 20-25°C, the bird uses a minimum of feed to maintain
body temperature. In cooler conditions, more diet energy must be used to maintain
body heat, (and so less feed is used for growth) and consequently feed efficiency
will deteriorate. Feed intake will increase by about 1% for each 1°C below
20°C. Between 20-25°C, the bird will eat about 1% less per 1°C increase
in temperature, and so here feed efficiency will improve (May et al., 1998).
Above 25°C (depending upon acclimatization), hat stress conditions can occur,
and then feed efficiency will again deteriorate because now the bird is using
energy to stay cool (panting, etc.). Under these conditions, feed efficiency
deteriorates further because the bird is reluctant to eat feed and so proportionally
more feed is directed towards maintenance, and less can be used for growth.
(Al Harthi and Macleod, 1996).
Health management
Obviously, an unhealthy bird is likely to have poor feed efficiency. The main
reason for this is that feed intake is reduced, and so again proportionally
more feed is directed towards maintenance. With enteric diseases, there can
be more subtle changes in feed utilization because various parasites and microbes
can reduce the efficiency of digestion and absorption of nutrients (Brandon
et al., 1997). A bird with sub-clinical coccidiosis is not likely to absorb
nutrients with optimum efficiency, because the oocytes will destroy some of
the cells lining the gut.
More recently, so-called "feed passage" has been observed in broilers.
Undigested feed particles are seen in the excreta, and so consequently feed
efficiency will be affected. The exact cause of this problem is unknown, but
is most likely the consequence of microbial challenge.
New measures of feed efficiency
Following are some new measures of feed efficiency and factors relating to their
use:
|
Criteria |
Measurement |
Comments |
|
Energy efficiency |
Energy intake: weight gain |
Energy is the most expensive nutrient, and so this
value is important. To some extent values are independent to feed intake. |
|
Feed cost |
Feed cost: weight gain |
Takes into account the fact that the most expensive
diet is not always the most profitable. |
|
Carcass yield |
Energy intake: carcass wt.Energy intake: breast meatFeed
cost: carcass wt.Feed cost: breast meat |
Takes into account the fact that birds of similar
weight may not always yield the same amount of edible carcass. |
|
Bird placement |
Feed cost/kg bird/sq. meterfloor space/yrEconomic
return/sq. meterfloor space/yr |
Optimizes the use of the building e.g.: higher nutrient
dense diets give faster growth rate, therefore more crops per year. |
|
Environment |
Nitrogen excretion/birdPhosphorus excretion/bird |
Future considerations for environmental stewardship. |
|
|
|
Summary
Feed efficiency of broilers is affected by bird age, sex, health and environmental
temperature, although the major factor is usually diet energy concentration.
With a very wide range of diet energy concentrations used world-wide today,
classical measures of feed intake:weight gain (or weight gain:feed intake) become
less meaningful. The "lowest" feed efficiency may not always be the
most profitable, because economics can dictate the optimum use of lower rather
than higher, diet energy levels. A more useful measure of feed usage today is
energy intake per unit of weight gain. For male birds the goals are for around
6.2 Mcals metabolizable energy per kg weight gain for 7 week-old birds. In the
future we may consider feed costs per unit of meat or may even have to take
into account efficiency of barn usage and also manure output as they influence
environmental stewardship.
Dr. Steve Leeson
Department of Animal & Poultry Science
University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario Canada N1G 2W12
References
Al-Harthi, M.A. and M.G. Macleod, 1996. Analysis of heat stress effects on growth
by pair feeding. Br. Poultry Sci. 37:542-43.
Branton, S.L., B.D. Lott, J.W. Deaton, W.R. Maslin, F.W. Hustin, L.M. Pote,
R.W. Keirs, M.A.
Latour, and E.J. Day, 1997. The effect of added complex carbohydrates or added
dietary fiber on necrotic enteritis lesions in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci.
76:24-78.
Leeson, S., L.J. Caston and J.D. Summers, 1988. Response of male and female
broilers to diet protein. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:881-890.
Leeson, S., L.J. Caston and J.D. Summers, 1996. Broiler response to diet energy.
Poultry Sci. 75:529-535.
May, J.D., B.D. Lott and J.D. Simmons, 1998. The effect of environmental temperature
and body weight on growth rate and feed:gain of male broilers. Poultry Sci.
77:499-501.
Sandercock, D.A., M.A. Mitchell and M.G. Macleod, 1995. Metabolic heat produciton
in fast and slow growing broiler chickens during acute heat stress. Poultry
Sci., 36;868.
Author: Dr. Steve Leeson
Who saw this article? New!
MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THIS ISSUE.
 
|
Technical Articles
