Engineer Montanaro, I am flattered by their words. I thank him their deference and alone I have left to add that in this topic, we all are learning in the road. By way of rounding the idea, indeed, the ing. Civilians participate actively to the design of elements for Plants of Treatment, thanks to their contributions for the design of big reservorios and ponds for the ecualizacion of the efluentes. And about the possibility of contributing in some point, count on me that it stops that we are.
Now then, just as the colleague he/she mentions it Adrián, a great interest exists in capital form to foment the construction of big capture centers and methane destruction. Regrettably, the conditions of most of these Broker of Coal are little less than leonine. At least with the representatives that I have contacted, these the Tn considers from Equivalent CO2 to 5 US $, when in the international market the funds are quoted above the 15 US $...
Returning to the topic of the construction of plants of Biogas, Mr. Victor's comment Cantaredo is a typical example of the Industrialization of the systems of Treatments of Efluentes (UASB) where mix different organic loads of characteristic dissimilar for an integral handling. In Colombia, the company Biotec had a capital paper for the resurgence (or one could say salvage) of this technology, to the to have been very bad used by a group of Sanitary Engineers that you/they applied this knowledge, in the construction of big projects that you/they never fulfilled the offered yields. Although for the design of the Biodigestor it is used some rules you practice very simple, an entire very complicated design methodology exists that is centered, want you or not, in the homogenizacion of the system and its control capacity. A plant designed to be operated manually, the risk runs of collapsing. Eye that not alone it is a comment. It has happened and but times of what is recognized openly.
As for the digestores variety, all can end up fulfilling the fact of producing Biogas, alone that some are but exposed to fail that others. The technology of each one of them, predisposes them for certain conditions, improving this way its efficiency. If some participant, has interest in obtaining biogas like thermal source for some tasks (to cook, to heat water for the showers), the mechanism is very simple and the investment is tiny. If on the other hand, what is sought is to replace energy deficiencies that commit other investments (Heating of galpones of chickens, boilers for teams of having pasteurized, Treatment of Efluentes for demands of the sanitary authorities) then, the design should be careful with the characteristics of the waste and to consider additional teams to reduce the range of the variables (zarandas, desarenadores, desnatadores, etc) and this way to be sure that the bacterias will receive oneself diet (or very similar) every day. It is for that reason that the Biodigestor under these conditions, represents a strong investment and mostly, its control system is automated (most of times, the companies don't offer copies of the programming). To the colleague of Ica, I mention him that I have designed projects for a farm of guinea pigs, without more problems. Even the I found Casablanca, it maintains a digestor Chinese type in Pachacamanc, Lima with the help of this type of manure and ProCabra, maintains another in its farm model, in Lima.
For the rest of the Forum, greetings and thank you to assist me. |
|