| NEWS |
 |
|
|
 Technical Articles
/ Technical Articles' List
/
Back to Pig Industry
|
| |
Aflatoxin: An Occasional Contaminant of Feed Grains |
  (3 Sent)
Who saw this article? New!
Author: Allen Harper, Extension Animal Scientist and Swine and Junmei Zhao, Graduate Student - Animal & Poultry Sciences (Livestock Update, Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension)
Publication date: 05/12/2008
Aflatoxins are toxic by-products produced by the fungi Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. The Aspergillus fungus can germinate and grow on feed grains at moisture levels of 15 % or greater in the presence of warm (70 to 100° F) temperatures. Aflatoxin production by the fungus is optimal at moisture levels greater than 17.5 % and temperatures of 77 to 92° F. The toxin can infect a variety of grains but most often occurs in corn. Infection can occur while grain is standing in the field, at and soon after harvest and during storage before or after the grain is processed into feed.
Outbreaks of acute aflatoxin problems vary among different grain producing regions and depend on growing conditions within a region. Some years the problem will be non-existent but in other years major outbreaks will occur. Corn grown in the southeastern U.S. has the most frequent occurrence, but significant problems can occur in the Midwestern states as well. Drought conditions, heavy insect damage and other crop stress are associated with greater occurrence of aflatoxin in corn. After harvest delayed drying, inadequate drying and poor storage conditions can contribute to increased aflatoxin production.
There are four major types of the aflatoxin molecule referred to as B1, B2, G1, and G2. Aflatoxin B1 is by far the most prevalent and the most toxic. Swine and other livestock and poultry are susceptible to aflatoxins at very low levels measured in parts per billion (ppb). Low levels of aflatoxin (20 to 200 ppb) in the diet of pigs can result in decreased feed intake, slower growth rate and decreased ability to resist disease. In general younger animals are more susceptible than older market animals or breeding animals. With increasing levels of aflatoxin in the diet, depressions in feed intake and growth rate become severe. If aflatoxin levels are high enough, liver damage can occur.
When aflatoxin contaminated rations are fed to lactating animals, the toxin may be secreted in milk resulting in a negative impact on suckling young. Metabolites of aflatoxin excreted in milk have been designated M1 and M2.
Table1. FDA action levels for aflatoxins in food and feedstuffs
|
Commodity |
Concentration,
ppb |
| All products, except milk, designated for humans |
20 |
| Milk |
0.5 (M1) |
| Corn for immature animals and dairy cattle |
20 |
| Corn and peanut products for breeding cattle, breeding swine, and mature poultry |
100 |
| Corn and peanut products for finishing swine |
200 |
| Corn and peanut products for finishing beef cattle |
300 |
| Cottonseed meal (as a feed ingredient) |
300 |
| All other feedstuffs |
20 | Source: CAST, 2003
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established "action levels" for total aflatoxins in food and feed (Table 1). These levels are intended as a guideline to prevent problems in human food and animal feed products. These levels can also be used by FDA to determine if enforcement actions should be taken when aflatoxin contaminated grains or feeds are sold and transported commercially.
Determination of the presence of aflatoxin in a feed grain can only be accomplished by chemical assay. An original screening test used at grain elevators and buying stations was to visually inspect samples of corn under an ultraviolet light for the presence of fluorescent particles. This test is capable of detecting the presence of the Aspergillus fungi, but it does not confirm if aflatoxin, the toxic by-product of the fungi, is present. In sophisticated laboratory settings, thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography have been used to accurately detect and quantify aflatoxin in grain and feed samples. More recently, commercial laboratories have developed rapid chemical field test kits that are relatively inexpensive, simple to conduct and require a minimum of special reagents and equipment to conduct. When the directions are followed carefully, these assay kits are very reliable in detecting the presence of aflatoxin at a specified concentration in samples. These kits can be used to determine the presence of aflatoxin at minimum allowable levels. Positive samples may then be forwarded to commercial laboratories for quantification of aflatoxin. With some modifications and serial dilution techniques, the test kits can also be used to quantify aflatoxins. Test kits are also available for detection of other important mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON or vomitoxin) and zearalenone.
When a feedstuff such as corn is contaminated with aflatoxin, several strategies have been identified to reduce potential negative affects of using the grain in animal feeds. If the level of contamination is low, the addition of other dietary ingredients such as protein, mineral and vitamin supplements may be all that is needed to dilute the toxin level and eliminate negative impacts on animals. Higher contamination levels may require that other grain sources free of aflatoxin may need to be blended with the contaminated grain to lower the aflatoxin concentration. Research has shown that several clay-based anti-caking and pellet aid feed additives added to the diet can reduce the negative impact of aflatoxins in some swine, cattle and poultry feeding situations. Segregating the aflatoxin contaminated feedstuff and using it strategically on lower risk animals (Table 1) has also been used effectively.
It has been suggested that broken and damaged kernels of corn are more susceptible to Aspergillus colonization than intact kernels. However, physical separation to reduce mycotoxin contamination in grains has produced mixed results. In the fall of 2002 we conducted a demonstration experiment at the Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC in Suffolk using corn that we had obtained from a local grain dealer. The corn (approximately 2800 bushels) was produced during the 2002 growing season, obtained by a local grain dealer and delivered to a storage bin at our swine research unit. Drought conditions during the growing season and reports from producers and grain dealers suggested that some risk for aflatoxin contamination existed in the 2002 crop. We used a commercial aflatoxin test kit (Agri-Screen®, Neogen Corporation, Lansing MI) on a single representative sample of corn from the bin. The result indicated that aflatoxin was present at a level of at least 20 ppb. The sample was forwarded to the toxicology laboratory at the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine and analysis verified that aflatoxin was present and quantified at a concentration of 57 ppb.
Our demonstration experiment involved taking four replicate samples of 2 to 3 lbs. from each of three depth regions in the bin. We used a probe-type grain sampler and the sample depths were approximately 1, 3 and 5 meters deep from the top surface of the grain.
In the laboratory the samples were mechanically shaken over a metal screen with round openings 17/64 inches in diameter. Using this process finer particles (fines) passed through the screen and were separated from the intact corn kernels. After screening, fines made up 7.9 to 9.2% of the total sample weight. Dry matter and bulk density were determined for each sample fraction. The samples were ground in a laboratory grist mill and sent to the toxicology laboratory for determination of aflatoxin concentration.
Samples taken at 1 meter depth had slightly lower dry matter than those taken at 3 and 5 meter depths (87.7% vs. 88.7 and 88.6%). Whole kernels also had slightly less dry matter than fines (87.8% vs. 88.8%).
Differences were also observed in bulk density of the samples. Samples had bulk densities of 688.9, 702.3 and 717.5 grams/liter for bin depths of 1, 3 and 5 meters. The whole kernel fraction had greater bulk density than the fines fraction (755.8 vs. 649.9 grams/liter).
Furthermore the demonstration illustrated the fact that location within the bin can have a significant impact on aflatoxin concentration (Tables 2 and 3). The greatest concentration of aflatoxin in both whole kernels and fines was in samples taken at the shallow depth (1 meter). The bin was filled with farm truck loads of approximately 300 bushels each. It is possible that the final loads delivered from the elevator to top off the bin were higher in aflatoxin that the earlier loads. The moisture content in the shallow sampling depth was also slightly higher which may have been more conducive to aflatoxin production.
Table 2. Effects of gain fraction (whole kernel or fines) and sampling depth on aflatoxin concentration (ppb) in corn.
|
Grain
fraction* |
Sample depth* in bin |
| |
1 meter |
3 meters |
5 meters |
| Whole kernel |
31 |
9 |
13 |
| Fines |
235 |
82 |
96 | * Significant effects of depth, grain fraction and depth by grain fraction interaction.
Table 3. Main effects of grain fraction and sampling depth on aflatoxin concentration (ppb) in corn.
|
Main effect
of sample depth |
Main effect
of grain fraction |
|
Depth |
Aflatoxin |
Fraction |
Aflatoxin |
|
1 meter |
133 a ppb |
Whole kernel |
18 x ppb |
|
3 meters |
46 b ppb |
Fines |
138 y ppb |
|
5 meters |
54 b ppb |
|
| a, b means in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly.
x, y means in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly.
Perhaps the most interesting finding was that the fines fraction contained substantially greater aflatoxin concentration than the whole kernel fraction (Tables 2 and 3). Based on this it appears that the fines fraction contributed most of the aflatoxin contamination problem in this particular bin of corn. We have no definitive explanation for the highly different aflatoxin concentrations in the two fractions. Visually, the fines fraction appeared to consist of a few weed seeds, small pieces of chaff, and bits and pieces of broken corn kernels. We speculate that greater surface area and starch exposure associated with broken pieces of grain provided a better medium for Aspergillus growth and aflatoxin production. Under the conditions of this demonstration, it appears that corn screening to remove fines would be effective in reducing aflatoxin to levels that pose little risk for livestock and poultry feeding.
Author: Allen Harper, Extension Animal Scientist and Swine and Junmei Zhao, Graduate Student - Animal & Poultry Sciences (Livestock Update, Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension)
Publication date: 05/12/2008
(3 Sent)
Who saw this article? New!
 DISCUSSIONS ON THIS ISSUE.
 
| 05/13/2008 |
 |
|
|
|
Good article.
Please carry on writing such articles.
Best of luck.
Dr. Munawar Ali | Answer Checked by Engormix.com  |
|
![]()
|
|
ENGOREART POR 20080725
|
| |
|
| |
Related Products |
 |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
 |
Biomin (Austria) |
Mycofix Plus
The Mycofix® Plus product line represents a modular system that protects animal health by deactivation of mycotoxins, taken in with respectively conta...
|
|
| |
| |
 |
Süd-Chemie (Germany) |
TOXISORB
TOXISORB® – Feed Additive for the
Deactivation of all kind of Mycotoxins.
TOXISORB® effectively binds all kinds
of mycotoxins and thus render...
|
|
| |
| |
 |
VICAM () |
Afla B
Afla B™ from VICAM is the trusted aflatoxin B test that produces precise numerical results. Using monoclonal antibody-based affinity chromatography, A...
|
|
| |
| |
|
VICAM () |
Afla M1 HPLC
Using monoclonal antibody-based affinity chromatography, Afla M1 HPLC is an HPLC-only test for the detection of aflatoxin M1 using immunoaffinity colu...
|
|
| |
| |
|
VICAM () |
AflaOchra HPLC
AflaOchra HPLC™ from VICAM is the only test that employs a single column to produce precise numerical results in determining both aflatoxin and ochrat...
|
|
| |
| |
|
VICAM () |
FumoniTest
Using monoclonal antibody-based affinity chromatography, FumoniTest™ from VICAM is the trusted fumonisin test that produces precise numerical results....
|
|
| |
| |
|
VICAM () |
OchraTest
OchraTest is safe and simple. It can be performed in less than 10 minutes and requires no special skills. Results may be recorded using a digital fluo...
|
|
| |
| |
|
VICAM () |
ZearalaTest
Using monoclonal antibody-based affinity chromatography, ZearalaTest™ from VICAM is the trusted zearalenone test that produces precise numerical resul...
|
|
| |
| |
|
VICAM () |
MF-2000 Mini Fluorometer
MF-2000 Mini Fluorometer
-Minimum capital equipment required
-MF-2000® uses the same proven affinity column technology as all of our mycotoxin test...
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
 |
Biovet S.A. (Spain) |
ALQUERFEED BINMOLD
DESCRIPTION
ALQUERFEED BINMOLD is a product in premix powder format based on aluminum-sodium-calcium-formate-propionate silicate hydrated 100%, ...
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
Technical Articles |
|
| |
Measuring Emission Rates of Particulate Matter From Fan Ventilated Swine Barns
Methods for measuring concentrations and emission rates of particulate matter (PM) from mechanically ventilated livestock building ...
Effect of Mixing Pigs or Maintaining Pen Integrity on the Response to Growing-Finishing Space Allocation
A cooperative study using 906 pigs was conducted to evaluate either mixing pigs or maintaining pen integrity during the move from ...
Treating Swine Manure with Aluminum Chloride
Liquid aluminum chloride can be added to swine manure at most types of production facilities. This may occur in the pit inside the ...
Aflatoxin: An Occasional Contaminant of Feed Grains
Aflatoxins are toxic by-products produced by the fungi Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. The Aspergillus fungus can ...
Castration of Pigs
Castration of male livestock intended for meat production is a long standing management practice. In North American swine producti ...
Dead Pig Disposal: An Unpleasant but Essential Topic
Even on well managed hog farms, some animals die before being marketed. For example, a 1,200-sow farm that produces 2.2 litters pe ...
Water Quality Considerations for Swine
Water is an essential nutrient which is often overlooked and given little attention. Plentiful, good quality water is essential fo ...
Nutritional approaches to reducing the environmental impact of outdoor pigs
Our thanks to the author and Conference Organisers, a Committee consisting of both University and Industry colleagues.
The full ...
The Spectre of Pollution from Animal Excreta with Special Reference to Pigs
There is much talk across the world, in locations as wide apart and diverse as the UK and New Zealand for example, about food safe ...
Swine Environmental Issues: Snowballing Legislation and Manure Management – Where Are We Headed?
During the past two decades pork production in the US has grown in numbers only slightly. However, there has been a shift in both ...
|
 See all...
| | | | | Related Forums | | | | Brucellosis test
Article: Aflatoxin: An Occasional Contaminant of Feed Grains
Article: The Fumonisins and their Deleterious Effects in Swine Production
Article: Mycotoxin in Swine Diets
Article: Treating Swine Manure with Aluminum Chloride
Article: Disinfection of Swine Barns
News: Right particle size reduces swine feed costs
Article: Growing potential for using dried distillers' grains with solubles in swine diets
Article: Triticale Grain in Swine Diets
News: Boehringer Ingelheim Hires New Swine Team Members
Article: Importance of mycotoxins in pigs
Article: Mycotoxin effects on the pig immune system
Chicken-feeded pigs
Article: Can we feed mycotoxin contaminated feed to pigs?
Article: Well-known and new approaches to Biomin® pHD
|
|
